A carbon credit score certificates is a allow that enables an business, that holds it, to emit a certain quantity of carbon dioxide or different greenhouse gases with equal mass as that of carbon credit. One carbon credit score permits the emission of a mass equal to 1 ton of carbon dioxide or equal quantities of one other greenhouse fuel. Carbon credit score buying and selling has seen a surge lately as local weather change continues to be one of many greatest worldwide agendas. The McKinsey report means that the worth of world carbon markets grew by 20% in 2020.

There’s, nonetheless, an ambiguous place as as to whether to tax these commodities as a Income Receipt or under no circumstances contemplating its related character as that of a Capital Receipt. Income Receipts are taxable underneath the Revenue Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter ‘the Act’) whereas the Capital Receipts should not because the Income Receipts are within the earnings assertion of an organization and are instantly taxable underneath the Act, nonetheless, the Capital Receipts are generated on account of switch of a capital asset of an organization.

The Revenue-tax Division has been treating such earnings, as acquired from the sale of carbon credit, as Enterprise Revenue underneath the Act which is topic to a tax fee of 30%. Divergent selections, nonetheless, have been given by a number of courts on the difficulty of whether or not to think about earnings acquired or receivable on the switch of carbon credit as Income Receipt or Capital Receipt. To deliver readability to this query, Part 115BBG has been included within the Act, nonetheless, the result was not as supposed, resulting in extra ambiguity.

This query has been not too long ago highlighted within the case of The Principal Commissioner of Revenue Tax v. M/S. Lanco Tanjore Energy Co. Ltd, which is but to be determined. Nonetheless, the authors have evaluated on this article the earlier and the present place of the sale of carbon credit in lieu of taxability in regards to the nature of receipt, by evaluating the traits of such a sale with Income Receipt and Capital Receipt respectively.


The sale of Carbon Credit is contested by the Income Division to be coated underneath the top of earnings and positive aspects of enterprise underneath Part 28(iv) of the Act, since Carbon Credit qualify as a profit, as has been acknowledged underneath Part 28(iv ), and additional have a transparent nexus with enterprise and so they come up in the middle of enterprise solely. Part 28(iv) of the Act defines earnings and positive aspects arising out of enterprise exercise as the worth of any profit or perquisite, whether or not convertible into cash or not, arising from enterprise or the train of a occupation. Subsequently, the sale of carbon credit additionally possesses the identical traits since they’re advantages that come up out of enterprise solely when the holding firm might have employed such sustainable means as are requisitioned by the United Nations Framework Conference on Local weather Change (hereinafter ‘UNFCCC’) or upgraded their enterprise mannequin to be made eligible for buying such credit. These contentions had been asserted within the case of Apollo tires Ltd. v. ACIT and had been upheld by the Cochin bench of the Revenue Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter ‘ITAT’). They could even be thought of as a profit to be arising out of enterprise based mostly on the same traits that they maintain with Import Entitlements which had been determined by the Kerala Excessive Courtroom as Income Receipts within the case of DK Industries & Others v Commr. of Revenue tax. That is how Carbon Credit maintain related character as that of a Income Receipt and have to be taxed in the identical means.


However, the contentions raised above have at all times been opposed by the assessee arguing that such a sale possesses the traits of capital positive aspects as outlined underneath Part 45 of the Act as a result of carbon credit should not a circulating asset of an organization as having been established in lots of circumstances resembling by the Hyderabad bench of the ITAT in CIT v. My Residence Energy Pvt. Ltd. and subsequently is a capital asset whose sale would produce a capital acquire. This acquire, nonetheless, is barred from being taxed underneath that the sale of carbon credit holds the traits of Capital Good points underneath Part 45 of the Revenue Tax Act, 1961. Nonetheless, since they haven’t been included in Part 55 of the Act regardless of being self-generated, they can’t be taxed as Capital Good points.

Additionally, since, Carbon Credit are entitlements supplied to an organization for emitting fewer Greenhouse Gases into the environment, the sale is an offshoot of environmental concern, which makes it exempt from taxation. The identical view is supported by the catena of judicial precedent together with the landmark judgment of My Residence Energy Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT.

Due to this fact, carbon credit have to be, as contested by the assessees, handled as a Capital Receipt and should not be taxed.


The introduction of Part 115BBG has made the complicated place of the carbon credit much more complicated by placing them underneath the chapter head of Dedication of Tax underneath Sure Particular Instances. Due to this fact, questions are being raised from each the perimeters of the Income Division in addition to the Assessee as to how these receipts have to be handled in circumstances previous to the introduction of Part 115BBG. Nonetheless, Income has been contending on the purpose that despite the fact that, the carbon credit maintain the twin nature of each environmental issues and earnings and positive aspects of enterprise, with the introduction of the part 115BBG, the intention of the legislature has been cleared that the stated transaction should at all times be taxed as a income receipt by nonetheless charging a sure share of tax. This competition is argued to be flawed since, if the Legislature was to think about such a sale as Income Receipt, they might have cleared it via together with such a transaction underneath the above-mentioned part as has been argued by the Income Division and wouldn’t have included a brand new part that’s Part 115BBG within the first place.


Carbon Credit little doubt maintain the twin character as a) they’re generated on account of the Clear Improvement Mechanism employed by the UNFCCC and b) they’re additionally arising out of enterprise issues in lieu of their commerce within the commodity alternate, producing income for a corporation and incentivising these firms to undertake such means and would produce additional earnings for them.

The true query nonetheless lies with the intention of the legislature as as to whether to think about the sale of Carbon Credit as a Income Receipt or a Capital Receipt and the reply to this could someplace lie among the many two factors mentioned additional.

firstit have to be famous and has been established in lots of circumstances by many courts together with the Hon’ble Supreme Courtroom within the case of Padmaraje R. Kadambande v. CIT that each one the Income Receipts which aren’t expressly excluded have to be taxable whereas all of the capital receipts except expressly debarred have to be ineligible to be taxed. Due to this fact, to tax a capital receipt, it should both be included underneath the definition of earnings underneath Part 2(24) or have to be expressly included underneath capital positive aspects outlined underneath Part 45 of the Act. Therefore, since on this case, both of them did not happen, subsequently, the intention of the legislature should have been to think about such receipts as income receipts.

Secondly, the apex court docket within the current case of VVF (India) Restricted v. State of Maharashtra, whereas discussing the strict interpretation of taxation statutes, reaffirmed Justice Bhagwati’s stand within the case of AV Fernandez v. The State of Kerala, that in a taxation statute nothing is to be construed, what’s written have to be adopted strictly and actually and subsequently, it can’t be construed, based mostly on what’s written, that these receipts had been supposed by the legislature to be handled as income receipt. Additional, to show {that a} specific receipt is of a income nature, the burden of proof lies on the Income Division, which on this case they’ve failed to supply for therefore far, subsequently, the receipt generated from the sale of carbon credit may be handled as capital receipts not liable to tax.


Judgments by totally different courts, together with the Hon’ble Supreme Courtroom, have to this point failed the willpower of the kind of receipt that the transaction at hand could be encompassed. Though, a concessional fee of 10% has been supplied to tax such situations, nonetheless, such standards could also be evaluated based mostly on the truth that the substantial query of regulation, that what might need been the intention of the legislature, was being ignored. Nonetheless, within the current case, this query has been raised and could be materials within the willpower of the long-awaited rhetorical. Due to this fact, to cease such a scenario from arising sooner or later, the talk have to be settled by the courts of regulation as quickly as doable as a result of if this debate stays unsettled, it should proceed to contribute to an erred system of taxation.

Key phrases: Taxation, Carbon Credit, Direct Taxation, Finance Act.

(Govind Gupta and Roshi Surele are 4th-year regulation college students from the Institute of Regulation, Nirma College. The creator(s) could also be contacted through mail at [email protected]).

Cite as: Govind Gupta and Roshi Surele, ‘Conundrums Involving Taxability of Carbon Credit Beneath Part 115bbg’ (The Rmlnlu Regulation Assessment Weblog15 September 2022) date of entry.